Photo Manipulation and Ethics
A. What are some of the main points you read about in the website above regarding manipulating images?
Some of the posts I've read about on the website regarding manipulating images are that manipulating photos are becoming a bigger and bigger issue in today's society, and that it is important for ALL photo journalists to present the pictures in the most natural form possible.
B. What is the philosophy of newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York times regarding image manipulation?
The philosophy of the popular newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times that regard to the manipulation of images are that the colors that are in the picture should not be changed.
B. What is the philosophy of newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York times regarding image manipulation?
The philosophy of the popular newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times that regard to the manipulation of images are that the colors that are in the picture should not be changed.
C. What do you think are acceptable things you could do to an image and not cross the line unto an unethical manipulation?
Some things that I think would be acceptable of not crossing the line into an unethical manipulation would be: it's okay to change how the lighting in the picture is, for example, if you take a really good picture but the lighting is too dark, it's okay to make it brighter.
D. This photo is the most unethical.That's because they manipulated the photo by adding a person into the photo to make it look like they were together. In this photo the two singers were not together. This makes the photo unethical because they changed the composition of the photo.
E. This is probably the least unethical. That's because the only thing that was done here was a minor cosmetic issue, by fixing the teeth. It's the least unethical because nothing major was changed in the composition. However, they did change the picture but they didn't take away the major focus.
Comments
Post a Comment